Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs

Updated: Nov 27, 2020

\

Do you know where you are on your journey of personal development?

We often struggle to balance the development we want with an appreciation for where we are and what we have. We also sometimes recognize when our stories send us into a negative loop, and we feel frustrated for not stopping them.

There are always a million things we're working on. Finding value in taking stock of where we are, where we came from, and where we want to go.

Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs as a Starting Point


Most of us have heard of Maslow's Hierarchy of needs. Truthfully, its origins aren't very scientific or rigorous. Abraham Maslow created this theory to classify human growth and motivation stages and didn't use a ton of objective research in the process.

Some ideas build off well-founded developmental psychology principles, but Maslow's sample size was small and relatively skewed. His method of biographical analysis was subjective.

Nevertheless, the Hierarchy of Needs is a model that's gained a lot of traction outside of the psychological community. It's in business, education, development work, and many others. It's become increasingly popular, and for a good reason. The model is simple, easy to understand, and, while it may not be perfect, it can be useful. It has five main parts;

  • Physiological needs: Our physical requirements for human survival.

  • Safety needs: Structure to keep us safe and secure.

  • Belongingness and love need Relationships and friendship, being part of a group.

  • Esteem needs: Reputation, respect from others, and respect for ourselves.

  • Self-actualization: Seeking deeper fulfillment and personal growth.

Elliot’s Gradients of Growth


Elliott's Gradients of Growth is an interpretation and adaptation of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, with a few key differences.

Here's how it's different.

Element 1: Each gradient builds on our earlier growth

The first and most simple difference is the naming convention at each stage. The Five S's are easier to remember and more tied to growth and personal development models, such as Kegan's Order of minds. These gradients are less about our needs and more about where we are in our growth journey.

  • Survival: Reactionary, impulsive, and focused on being and existing — we start here as infants, concerned only with staying alive.

  • Safety: Focused on preserving what we have; self-centered, fear-driven, and still looking back at survival.

  • Socialization: Centered on relationships and sharing, both focused on the existence (closer to safety) and fulfillment (closer to self-awareness).

  • Self-awareness: Where we begin real meaning-making and defining our own lives, we understand where we are and are authors of our worth.

  • Self-actualization: Hyper fulfillment-focused and values-driven; here, we are both aware of where we are and accept where we are, embracing the paradoxes.

Now is as good of a time as any to mention that these five stages are not concrete or discrete. They are gradients of each other.

Visually, there are five divisions, but practically, there are many more. Each overlaps and bleeds into the other. These are not distinct mile markers and not a judge of progress or "goodness." These are only entry points into reflection.

Element 2: We grow from existence into fulfillment

The second difference in Elliott's Gradients of Growth is that the model is rotated 90 degrees on its side, with a line dividing the scale into halves. The first half is "existence," where we focus on deficiency and scarcity. The second half is "fulfillment," where we focus on growth and opportunity.

As we grow, we climb through these gradients, moving from more existence-focused objectives to more fulfillment-focused goals. But this growth is not linear. We may dance from side to side, exploring our boundaries, or backtrack into other gradients. Some parts of us may live in different gradients and at different times.

Element 3: Our Decisions are rooted in our Perceptions.

The third and final difference is that this model grows in the area instead of shrinking. It's an upside-down pyramid. This is because we've added something called "the void," the shaded area where we risk (or perceive we risk) harm or even death.

This is critical. On the far left of the gradients, we are walking a tightrope. Any miscalculation and we risk falling into the void. As we progress, however, we gain more stability, and the area of the opening shrinks. At some point, represented by the dotted midline, the perceived possibility of falling into the void becomes smaller than the prospect of exploring our lives unharmed. We transition from deficiency needs to growth needs, from scarcity to opportunity.

Yes, there's more area to explore as we progress. But imagine the model in three dimensions, on an incline and getting steeper over time. Energetically, it's easier to go side-to-side or down than it is to climb up. But it's also riskier; there's more void. This is our internal calculus of risk versus reward and why lateral moves (feeling "stuck") become more common as we develop, even as our basic needs are being met.

This is essentially the Hierarchy of Needs mapped to Kegan's Orders of Mind, but I laid it out more explicitly, rotated it 90 degrees, and had it grow instead of diminishing in area. In other words, I did a Missy Elliott: I put the thing down, flipped it, and reversed it. Hence the name.

What can we learn from the model?


The model is all well and fine, but what does it give us? As an entry point for reflection, I believe it gives us quite a lot.

Insight 1: We cross a tipping point from a reactive to creative

At some point in our development journey, the risk of harm becomes smaller than the opportunity for growth — our pyramid becomes more significant than the void. And the line of that transition is smack in the middle of the socialization gradient.

Where we are in our socialization depends on whether we are building relationships for existence or fulfillment. Do we seek safety and acceptance, or are we seeking connection and partnership?

If we stay focused on the former, we are being built and authored by others' views. We seek approval and acceptance above all else. We operate out of fear. If we live in the latter, though, we are self-authoring our story. We work out of curiosity and interest. We seek meaning.

This is an excellent test for where we are in our lives.

Each part of us is different. Who we are at home might be several gradients removed from who we are at work. We might feel differently about one behavior or part of ourselves than another. The real question for reflection is: which side of the line are we on?

Insight 2: We are invited to become explorers as we grow.

As we grow and move through the pyramid, we begin to explore our boundaries. In existence, we are cautious of our limitations — we are on a narrow path. In fulfillment, we are curious and excited about our limits — we are on a broader course.

The perception here is everything. We may be timid if we believe the cliffs are near, foolish if we ignore how close they are.

But, the reality is that, after we cross the midpoint in socialization, our focus becomes more internal than external. Our task is no longer to survive but to explore.

This is a paradox that can be hard to accept. As we grow, we find more questions than answers. We see more and more safety, but there's also a more significant area to discover than ever before.


Insight 3: The path isn’t and shouldn’t be linear later on.

In the beginning, we're forced onto a reasonably direct route as we grow from survival to safety to socialization. The risk to backtrack or deviate is high. As we grow from socialization onward, however, there's more space to wander. This means that we may very well move from side to side or backward. The risk of doing so is low.

Farther up the pyramid, there's more space to wander. And this is the point. With a more extensive area comes more opportunity for discovery. We can't just dip into self-awareness and be done; there's a vast landscape to explore. Our task here is to cover more ground than ever, to map out this new edge of our growth.

Insight 4: The most important stories are carried with us from existence

Here is the most significant implication. Since our lives' existence phases are so much more direct and evident than the fulfillment phases, they also establish our most ingrained living patterns.

The first points in the journey are when we learn to tell ourselves that we must succeed to be accepted. Or we must be perfect to be loved. We tell ourselves stories in this part of life — stories to keep us safe. And these stories persist because of the simplicity of safety.

The tricky part is when we grow into a different way of being when safety is no longer our primary focus.

We take messages and models from our existence lives and carry them into our fulfillment lives. But there they can hold us back. When our stories persist into a life of growth, we're left with voices of insecurity or perfectionism or defensiveness or obedience that no longer serve us.

The task, then, becomes rewriting our stories, stories that are grounded in growth, not safety.


Where to from here?

I like this model and what I've dubbed Elliott's Gradients of Growth as a way to understand and reflect on where I am and where I'm going. The observations that I've listed above I also take to heart in my development.

`Here are four areas of inquiry I'll leave you with:

  • At a time, we cross a tipping point from reactive to creative: Which side of the line, between existence and fulfillment, are you on? Which parts of you look to relationships for validation, and which parts look to them for a deeper connection?

  • We are invited to become explorers as we grow: Where are you trying to grow and explore today? Do you see the future unknown as scary, inventing dangers and risks where there are none, or do you see it as an opportunity and a journey?

  • The path isn't (and shouldn't be) linear later on: How are you going to be compassionate to yourself when the climb is steep, as it will be, or when you backtrack or move side-to-side, as you will?

  • Our strongest stories are carried with us from "existence": What story are we telling ourselves today written when we needed safety and protection? When was it written, and why was it written?

What are you taking away? What are the stories you tell yourself, and where do they come from? What new lens does this give you to look at your life and your growth?

Here are a couple of books that expand on the Maslow Hierarchy of Needs :